Friday, May 21, 2010
Google TV - Official and headed for your A/V rack!
The device will run on Android (naturally) and utilise Google's powerful search algorithm work to enhance programme look-ups etc. It will also offer hd video calling and other marketplace features. It will have Chrome as its browser and will offer Flash 10.1 support as well as WiFi and hdmi integration with your home theatre set-up.
The first devices have been unveiled by Sony and Logitech with the Logitech device looking suitably small, sleek and speedy. It can even use your iPhone or Android mobile as a remote.
Many may argue that it is essentially a stripped out media centre device and does not offer anything which a reasonable htpc doesn't right now but one cannot overlook the power of Google and their commitment to Android has shown no signs of abating, making this device a likely necessity for future viewing nirvana thanks to no doubt regular software and feature updates and hopefully a blossoming marketplace of apps that will enhance viewer/user pleasure.
Merging web and tv has been tried before but hopefully this is the one to make it happen....
Friday, May 14, 2010
Augmented Reality...simply awesome...
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
YouTube IPL coverage a rousing success…

As if word of Google’s entry in to online television coverage of live events wasn’t enough, especilly when coupled with the development of Google TV set-top boxes, the Big G has announced that their coverage of the Indian Premier League cricket tournament was a resounding success attracting bigger revenues and sponsorship than anticipated.
Android overtakes iPhone
Friday, May 07, 2010
HP buys Palm...and hints at future direction

The recent purchase of Palm by HP was an unforeseen move by the world's biggest pc maker and one that clearly illustrates that even HP recognises that the future of computing will be conducted on mobile devices - either handhelds, slates or tablets.
Digital Economy Bill Debate
Thursday, April 08, 2010
Digital Economy Bill – A Parliamentary Whitewash

The contentious Digital Economy Bill has been hurried through the UK Parliament to the dismay of many members of the pubic and of Parliament. The DEBill as it is known aims to deliver greater copyright protection to the digital creative arts in the
The Government saw this as an essential tool in saving ‘hundreds of millions lost from the digital creative arts industry’. Anger has followed the superquick passing of the bill as it was heard during the wash-up period that comes in to play following an announcement of a general election and politicians on all sides said they were concerned that a bill of such importance was not heard and debated properly within Westminster.
However, I take issue with the amounts being bounced around – I would suggest that these are based on a simple ‘number of downloads x DVD/CD cost’. This is surely not emblematic of a ‘true cost of piracy’ as there was no guarantee that a downloader chose to download a file rather than pay for it. The person in question might never have bought the item if the option to acquire the file through a torrent or other method was unavailable so therefore you cannot say that the revenue was ‘lost’ – it was never likely to be there in the first place. Many argued that the sales of media actually rose for the first time since 2002, poking holes in the argument of lost income even further.
I still think of this along the lines of the famous copyleft t-shirt seen above – the digital industry failed to embrace the technological changes that have come in recent years yet continues to hold on to the notion of controlling the retail channels in the old-fashioned way – supply and demand. Everything is reversed now and the quicker the creative industries realise that and adapt, the better.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Google TV

Word has recently emerged of a collaboration between Google and several of the big consumer electronics firms in Sony, Logitech and Intel.
It seems they are co-developing the next weapon in Google’s war on established media business models in Google TV – which is in essence an open source set-top box operating system that will unify a number of existing services (web, media centre-esque, Android etc.) in to a lounge-friendly box.
By making the system open source, they are bound to attract developers who would see this as a way of combining web-based services with the traditional delivery of tv-based content. YouTube would be a certainty to feature on the device, further boosting revenues from this now profitable arm of the Google empire.
However, Google’s interest lies not only in the sale of the no-doubt Google branded boxes but also in the advertising that would surely follow. Giving away the O.S. is only the foot in the door. Indeed, Google have already said that they are keen to see the Google TV’s O.S. in as may blu-ray, cable box, games console, tv or other devices as possible and the company sees this as a way of further establishing itself in the tv advertising market which it has fairly recently moved in to.
The existing media and cable companies, especially in the
(Photo courtesy of www.HiDefDigest.com)
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Unbundled TV = Internet TV

The FCC, the
The likelihood of any FCC intervention is the forced unbundling of channels which would be like an atomic bomb on the existing business model of paid-for television. The further international impact would be that as the
In the UK, gone would be the minority channels such as Discovery Shed, Men and Motors, GOLD, the ‘+1’s’ repeat channels, limited broadcast schedule channels etc. and in would come probably fewer channels but higher quality content and less repeats. The reason for this would be the need for a unique draw as competitiveness would increase. The big winners would likely be the sports channels as these always sell well and the relative cost for these would drop as they were previously only available as part of a bigger bundle. However, there can be little doubt that there would be a large number of casualties.
The cost of broadcasting would also go up as the route-to-market providers (satellite transmission providers, cable companies etc.) would seek to recoup the lost income from the missing channels by driving up prices. However, advertising re-sale would be more valuable as fewer channels would control more eyeballs. The wider impact of this is likely to be that a number of channels will move to internet based television options – either directly through their own websites or via networks such as YouTube (see my Indian Premier League cricket post).
Internet tv is cheaper to produce, broadcast and maintain and 100% of revenues generated would go to the content creator – an incredibly appealing business model. With more and more devices networked to receive internet broadcasts including mobile phones, blu-ray players, ipads, ipods and network streamers, the accessibility of internet tv has moved beyond home theatre pc’s and gone mainstream. Even games consoles are in the mix with Sky’s channels now available on the Xbox 360.
Monday, February 01, 2010
iPad...iPah?!
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Google enters broadcasting...the revolution has begun and will be televised

Wow!...oft-mooted but never realised...until now. Google has entered the world of broadcasting by securing an agreement to broadcast live Indian Premier League cricket matches via YouTube.
Monday, January 18, 2010
Undercooked - P2P case throws light on this complex issue
Wednesday, January 06, 2010
Film of the Year
Tuesday, January 05, 2010
Google's Gamechanger?
Monday, December 14, 2009
"Unleash the Googlephone"
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
One can but dream...
Droid does...and the Ninja might do too...
The Cyborg Ninja has been a loyal and proud user of Windows Mobile, ever since my first monochrome Pocket PC and right through until now with my HTC Touch Diamond 2 mobile phone - a lovely device capable of pretty much every computing and communication task I need. However, this could well be set to change....
The recently launched Motorola Droid phone, currently only available in the USA, is an Android-based device and pretty much the pinnacle of open-app phone development. This device can do everything, without the intentional drawbacks or restrictions of an iPhone or the unintentional limitations of Windows Mobile. The concept of an open architecture mobile phone operating system appeals and the rapid adoption of Android (led by Google) is incredibly encouraging.
The commcercial appeals and so does the spec list of this tasty slab of technology...
Monday, November 09, 2009
Speed Racer...visual art?
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Justice?
Friday, September 11, 2009
The Impact of Latency
The Ninja recently has become fascinated by the powers of the modern connected world in addressing the issue of latency. Latency has traditionally been a term of concern limited to the IT professional’s world, in particular reference to the speed of a network and its capacity to provide a snappy service to the terminals connected to it.
Now, however, latency is increasingly used when talking of broader communication activities such as e-mail, text messaging, blogging etc…it's even creeping in to marketing-speak.
Take the delivery of news as an example – not too long ago, the main vehicle for the latest news was the letter and then the daily newspaper. This therefore saw news delivered when it was days old. The paper might have arrived every 24 hours but often the stories were older than that due to print deadlines etc. so there was always a delay.
The development of the Internet saw the speed of delivery of news increase rapidly to hours, if not minutes, negating the ‘first for news’ position of the newspapers. Information would be posted on the internet, the reader would then go find it at a website or blog and digest it that way.
This was taken further with the adoption of instant messaging such as sms, with networks of friends able to quickly pass on information through mobile devices, further shortening the delay in getting the word out.
Now with services such as Twitter and Facebook, news has been reduced to almost instantaneous levels of availability whereby the story (the vehicle used by the newspaper) has almost merged with the text messaging concept (sms). Latency here is milliseconds. However, the newsmakers and bloggers were often still controlling the story. They write, you read. Only recently have individuals begun to harness the capacity to contribute to the news. Old-style newsmakers were the first to see the potential but only now are we grabbing it ourselves.
However, the capacity of sites like Twitter allow us to go beyond this…with the recent example of the air collision over the
Indeed the recent flypast of the Airbus A380 over the UK allowed the Ninja to try this out first hand. A quick Twitter search for 'A380' pulled in hundreds of tweets from people posting information on what they had seen and heard of the big plane as it flew its tour of UK airspace. These links in turn led to TwitPics of groups of planespotters or shots of the plane in the sky etc. giving you immediate on-the-ground access to the 'news' as defined by your own search query. Very, very cool indeed...as long as you can find what you are looking for!
As a result, the minimisation of latency has empowered the reader with the capacity to craft their own news story, cutting the traditional media creators out of the loop entirely. Newspapers have known about the internet for about 15 years but most have been very slow to change their ways of working to adapt to this powerful technological threat.
Despite this, these developments will not suit everyone. People are used to having their entertainment served up to them with minimal hassle but the power of microblogging and its merger of traditional newsmaking, social interaction, internet immediacy and pure strength-in-numbers community grunt shows that it is undoubtedly the future of media and one that is still evolving for all concerned. Indeed many people talk of hyper micro blogging as the future as we link in to a variety of small very but 'personal to us' local networks.
There is no one clear path for this cutting edge concept but the user will certainly be the winner as it will undoubtedly provide a quicker, more immediate connected and pervasive service at a much lower price than existing media structures. The key for those on the other side is how to monetise it, if at all….no easy task.
Whatever happens, thanks to latency the future should be incredibly exciting…








